BICKNELL - City council members here held a first reading Monday on an ordinance that would raise water rates for residents.
The ordinance indicates an increase from $4.04 to $7 per 1,000 gallons with a cap of $6 for use of over 30,000 gallons. The ordinance also allows for a nearly 50 percent increase in monthly meter fees and a tap charge of $750 for a 3/4 inch or smaller tap. Previously, residents only had to pay $198 for a 3/4 inch or smaller tap.
No one reportedly spoke in opposition of the increase, which came as a surprise to Clerk-Treasurer Rita Dupire.
However, some residents who attended the meeting did suggest adding a clause to the ordinance that would allow for minor percentage increases to the water
rates over time.
"That way residents aren't hit with major increases all at once but with gradual increases that cover the cost of inflation," Dupire said. "No one said anything against the rate increases and I'm glad no one complained, but it made me wonder what the heck was going on!"
"Maybe it's something in the water," she added with a chuckle.
In March, council member Frank Gugliotta said the city has been paying $12,000 a month since 1979 on a loan for the water plant they'd built. The debt is not scheduled to be paid off until 2019.
The current rate for water hasn't been increased for 25 years.
Council members also addressed several improvement projects they plan to tackle this spring and tabled a couple of others.
Resident Peggy Magill, representing Melvin Olson, asked council members to consider a request to remove some of the concrete from a lot at 105 S. Main St.
"There was an old foundation of a building on that lot and when the building was taken down they filled the foundation with gravel," said Clerk-treasurer Rita Dupire. "Peggy wanted permission to remove the concrete but the council tabled her request until they had the opportunity to take a look at the lot."
Dupire said Olson is currently using the lot for parking and that removing the concrete foundation blocks will make the area smoother.
Harold Schlomer, a member of the St. Philip Neri Catholic Church asked council members to approve the posting of handicap parking signs outside the church along Vigo Street.
Council members approved the purchase and posting of the signs, but the expense of the signs and curb painting will be covered by the church, Dupire said.
Jim Crist, a resident who lives along Seventh Street, asked council members to consider repairing a bridge on the street.
"He said the bridge is sinking and the council is concerned about gas lines in that area," Dupire said. "The council unanimously approved making repairs to the bridge."
Street superintendent Ron Julian asked the council to approve posting no semi-truck signs on Washington Street, North Franklin Avenue, 12th Street and Freelandville Avenue.
"Ron says the road just can't hold the weight of the trucks and that several trucks are apparently trying to use those roads," Dupire said. "Our attorney, Kerry Currier, is also working on drawing up an ordinance that prohibits trucks from using those roads."
Dupire said the council tabled Julian's request until they could review the condition of the roads and the ordinance could be drawn up.
Staff writer Jennifer Gordon
Vincennes Sun-Commercial
Comments
No complaints (yet)
Her story has some inaccuracies starting with the possible rate itself, it is actually $7.38 plus or minus a few cents, with a lower rate of a dollar less for those over 30000 gallons.
I complained that a big user should not get a break as it costs us the same to produce their water per thousand. I was told that we furnish 'service' to them and for some reason they should get a break.
I don't understand this as a user like the new concrete plant (possibly) since they are already getting the use of the 4 acres for free actually should pay a premium. I'm sure they expected to.
Other big users like TP Court and others would welcome the break but its totally unnecessary and unfair to the average Joe who would be subsidizing the big user.
Frank mentioned the possibility of only reading meters every other month but the girls in the office reacted with 'What if there is a leak?'. Maybe if we started reading the meters every two weeks we could catch leaks quicker.
This isn't valid.
It seems that the new tap-in fees being so high will help discourage people from moving to our community. Is it to prevent people from moving in trailers? I thought we wanted the workers business in our community.
Vincennes charges $350 for a water tap in compared to our proposed $750.
Not mentioned at the council meeting but is a suggestion that I previously had given Frank was to charge a minimum water and sewage bill on buildings that have their service shut off like Oaktown does.
Repos and houses between tenants keep the electricity on so their sump pumps will keep their basements from flooding and most of the water goes to our sewage plant. Not to mention all the occupied houses sending basement water to the sewage plant. (A big part of the reason we are now building our $4.75 million dollar plant).
Most of these vacant houses are owned by either banks, investors, landlords or others who could well afford to pay a minimum. And if this were the case the owners would be more likely to keep them occupied and paying into the water dept. As well as helping the schools with more students which bring more state funds.
Ron Ackman