Careers of congress

Congress should not be a career consisting of drinks, dinners and speeches and should not be designed as such; all benefits should be removed and each congress person should be presented with a place to live (dorm type), medical while serving, no retirement plan or benefits unless set up and paid personally , transportation to and from congress should be furnished and overseas trips should be a personal expense paid for by the office holder not the tax payers; it is way past time for people to ask how a person can go to congress and work for the people and accumulate millions in their bank accounts, all monies paid by outside sources should be given to the people not the politicians whether trips, items or cash.
This would go hand in hand with term limits just as the presidency has (two terms) otherwise only the rich would be able to serve because everybody else would need to return to whatever career they earned a living at. The United States of America does not need 90 year old office holders who have been in office for 40 years; our country does not need a dynasty that lives off of the people while active in office or retired from office, let’s leave this to the Europeans.
No foreigners should ever be allowed to contribute to the American congress via campaign contributions direct or indirect; all contributions must be accompanied with a money trail proving the starting point. If they are not a legal immigrant or a citizen then they should not be allowed to interfere with our elections.
John R. Stanczak

Comments

John I believe you are more

John I believe you are more conservative than me. Without all the perks who would run? Just the rich that don't need the pay and can outspend their competitors. How about a limit of 100,000 campaign finances for congress and maybe 500,000 for president? Not so sure that would get our best candidates to run, but then maybe the ones who really love our country and feel they can do something good would. The endless campaigning between elections is getting rediculous.

Ron Ackman

Who would run?

People who wanted to help the people of this country would run; the founding fathers ran to create a better nation not because of perks and people who run because of perks are not fit to be in office whether rich or poor.

I ran for mayor because I wanted to help Bicknell not because of pay or perks and I would have run for the same reason even if it was an office of no pay.

Right now we have a president who has not stopped running for office because he does not know how to manage but does understand perks and has become a millionaire because of the various perks while destroying the lives of millions of American citizens with his failing policies. The answer is no perks and term limits.

John R. Stanczak